Latest News “Stay informed with breaking news, world news, US news, politics, business, technology, and more at latest news.

Category: medicine

Auto Added by WPeMatico

  • Man fails to take his medicine—the flesh starts rotting off his leg

    If you were looking for some motivation to follow your doctor’s advice or remember to take your medicine, look no further than this grisly tale.

    A 64-year-old man went to the emergency department of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston with a painful festering ulcer spreading on his left, very swollen ankle. It was a gruesome sight; the open sore was about 8 by 5 centimeters (about 3 by 2 inches) and was rimmed by black, ashen, and dark purple tissue. Inside, it oozed with streaks and fringes of yellow pus around pink and red inflamed flesh. It was 2 cm deep (nearly an inch). And it smelled.

    The man told doctors it had all started two years prior, when dark, itchy lesions appeared in the area on his ankle—the doctors noted that there were multiple patches of these lesions on both his legs. But about five months before his visit to the emergency department, one of the lesions on his left ankle had progressed to an ulcer. It was circular, red, tender, and deep. He sought treatment and was prescribed antibiotics, which he took. But they didn’t help.

    Read full article

    Comments

  • U.S. approves twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV but cuts to public health and foreign aid cloud its prospects

    The U.S. has approved the world’s only twice-a-year shot to prevent HIV, the first step in an anticipated global rollout that could protect millions – although it’s unclear how many in the U.S. and abroad will get access to the powerful new option.

    While a vaccine to prevent HIV still is needed, some experts say the shot made by Gilead Sciences — a drug called lenacapavir — could be the next best thing. It nearly eliminated new infections in two groundbreaking studies of people at high risk, better than daily preventive pills they can forget to take.

    “This really has the possibility of ending HIV transmission,” said Greg Millett, public policy director at amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research.

    Condoms help guard against HIV infection if used properly but what’s called PrEP — regularly using preventive medicines such as the daily pills or a different shot given every two months — is increasingly important. Lenacapavir’s six-month protection makes it the longest-lasting type, an option that could attract people wary of more frequent doctor visits or stigma from daily pills.

    But upheaval in U.S. healthcare — including cuts to public health agencies and Medicaid — and slashing of American foreign aid to fight HIV are clouding the prospects.

    Millett said “gaping holes in the system” in the U.S. and globally “are going to make it difficult for us to make sure we not only get lenacapavir into people’s bodies but make sure they come back” twice a year to keep up their protection.

    Gilead’s drug already is sold to treat HIV under the brand name Sunlenca. The prevention dose will be sold under a different name, Yeztugo. It’s given as two injections under the skin of the abdomen, leaving a small “depot” of medication to slowly absorb into the body. People must test negative for HIV before getting their twice-a-year dose, Gilead warned. It only prevents HIV transmission — it doesn’t block other sexually transmitted diseases. Some researchers who helped test the shot advise cold packs to counter injection-site pain.

    Global efforts at ending the HIV pandemic by 2030 have stalled. There still are more than 30,000 new infections in the U.S. each year and about 1.3 million worldwide.

    Only about 400,000 Americans already use some form of PrEP, a fraction of those estimated to benefit. A recent study found states with high use of PrEP saw a decrease in HIV infections, while rates continued rising elsewhere.

    About half of new infections are in women, who often need protection they can use without a partner’s knowledge or consent. One rigorous study in South Africa and Uganda compared more than 5,300 sexually active young women and teen girls given twice-yearly lenacapavir or the daily pills. There were no HIV infections in those receiving the shot while about 2% in the comparison group caught HIV from infected sex partners.

    A second study found the twice-yearly shot nearly as effective in gay men and gender-nonconforming people in the U.S. and in several other countries hard-hit by HIV.

    Ian Haddock of Houston had tried PrEP off and on since 2015 but he jumped at the chance to participate in the lenacapavir study and continues with the twice-yearly shots as part of the research follow-up.

    “Now I forget that I’m on PrEP because I don’t have to carry around a pill bottle,” said Haddock, who leads the Normal Anomaly Initiative, a nonprofit serving Black LGBTQ+ communities.

    “Men, women, gay, straight – it really just kinds of expands the opportunity for prevention,” he added. Just remembering a clinic visit every six months “is a powerful tool versus constantly having to talk about, like, condoms, constantly making sure you’re taking your pill every day.”

    Gilead said the U.S. list price, meaning before insurance, is $28,218 a year, which it called similar to some other PrEP options. The company said it anticipated insurance coverage but also has some financial assistance programs.

    Most private insurers are supposed to cover PrEP options without a co-pay although the Supreme Court is considering a case that could overturn that requirement. Congress also is considering huge cuts to Medicaid. And while community health centers still are an option, the Trump administration has largely dismantled HIV prevention work at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that would normally get the message to vulnerable populations who’d qualify for the shot, said Carl Schmid of the nonprofit HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute.

    Schmid worries the shot won’t meet its potential because “we’re basically pulling the rug out of HIV prevention and testing and outreach programs.”

    Gilead also has applications pending for the twice-yearly shot in other countries. Last fall, the company signed agreements with six generic drug makers to produce low-cost versions of the shot for 120 poor countries mostly in Africa, Southeast Asia and the Caribbean. Gilead plans to make enough shots to supply 2 million people in those countries, at no profit, until the generics are available, said company senior vice president Dr. Jared Baeten.

    Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS, said in a statement the price is still too high. If it’s unaffordable, she said, “it will change nothing.”

    And HIV experts worry the arrangements Gilead has made to reduce costs in some countries leave out middle-income countries like some in Latin America.

    “Everyone in every country who’s at risk of HIV needs access to PrEP,” said Dr. Gordon Crofoot of Houston, who helped lead the study in men. “We need to get easier access to PrEP that’s highly effective like this is.”

    This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

  • Novo Nordisk is losing Canadian patent protection on a blockbuster drug after not paying a small fee

    • The pharma giant will lose its patent protection on semaglutide, which is sold as Ozempic and Wegovy, in Canada after not paying a nominal maintenance fee years before it became a blockbuster drug for fighting diabetes and obesity, Science reported. Novo Nordisk generates billions of dollars in revenue on the drug in Canada, but patent protection is due to end next year.

    Years before semaglutide became a blockbuster drug for Novo Nordisk, the Danish pharma giant had a chance to maintain its patent in Canada but didn’t pay a small fee to do so, according to a recent report in Science.

    The drug, which is sold as Ozempic and Wegovy, has made so much money for Novo Nordisk after exploding in popularity in the last few years that it has even impacted Denmark’s currency and interest rates.

    To keep the semaglutide patent in Canada, the company had to pay an annual fee of just 250 Canadian dollars (~$185 USD). While it paid that amount in 2018, Science reported that it didn’t the following year.

    The Canadian government offered Novo Nordisk another chance to keep its patent, this time with an additional charge that brought the total to 450 Canadian dollars ($331 USD).

    “In order to prevent the patent from lapsing, the amount listed above, which includes the required maintenance fee and the late payment fee, must be paid within the one year period of grace following the filing date anniversary,” a letter from regulators said, putting the anniversary date at March 20, 2019. “Once a patent has lapsed it cannot be revived.”

    Makers of generic drugs have taken notice, with Science pointing to recent comments from the company Sandoz that it has filed to launch a generic GLP-1 in Canada next year and expects approval sometime in the first quarter when exclusivity expires. 

    “Interesting market. Novo never filed a patent in Canada. Never know why,” Sandoz CEO Richard Saynor told Endpoints News earlier this month. “I’m sure someone’s lost their job, but never mind. It’s the second-largest semaglutide market in the world.”

    In a statement to Fortune, Novo Nordisk said there was no mistake regarding its patent maintenance fee in Canada and declined to comment on other drug manufacturers’ plans.

    “All intellectual property decisions are carefully considered at a global level,” the company added. “Periods of exclusivity for pharmaceutical products end as part of their normal lifecycle and generic treatments may become available over time.”

    The company confirmed that protection for semaglutide regulatory submissions in Canada will expire in 2026.

    Meanwhile, Ozempic patents expire several years later in other big markets like the U.S. (2032), Japan (2031), and Europe (2031), according to the company’s most recent annual report.

    Last year, Novo Nordisk generated about $19 billion in global Ozempic sales and about $9 billion in Wegovy sales. In Canada, retail pharmacies there booked Ozempic sales of 2.5 billion Canadian dollars.

    This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

  • Trump administration cancels $766 million contract with Moderna to develop vaccine against pandemic flu viruses

    The Trump administration has canceled $766 million awarded to drugmaker Moderna Inc. to develop a vaccine against potential pandemic influenza viruses, including the H5N1 bird flu.

    The company said it was notified Wednesday that the Health and Human Services Department had withdrawn funds awarded in July 2024 and in January to pay for development and purchase of its investigational vaccine.

    The funds were awarded through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, a program that focuses on medical treatments for potential pandemics.

    The new vaccine, called mRNA-1018, used the same technology that allowed development and rollout of vaccines to fight Covid-19 in record time.

    Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has expressed deep skepticism regarding mRNA vaccines, despite real-world evidence that the vaccines are safe and saved millions of lives.

    The cancelation came as Moderna announced positive interim results from an early-stage trial of the vaccine that targeted H5 bird flu virus, tested in 300 healthy adults.

    “While the termination of funding from HHS adds uncertainty, we are pleased by the robust immune response and safety profile observed in this interim analysis,” the company said in a statement.

    H5N1 bird flu viruses spilled from wild bird into cattle in the U.S. last year, infecting hundreds of animals in several states. At least 70 people in the U.S. have been sickened by bird flu infections, mostly mild. One person died. Scientists fear that continued mutation of the virus could allow it to become more virulent or more easily spread in people, with the possibility that it could trigger a pandemic.

    Moderna received $176 million in July 2024 and $590 million in January. The January award would have supported a late-stage clinical trial that could have determined the vaccine’s efficacy against pandemic viruses, including bird flu, a company spokesman said.

    This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

  • Zepbound users lost nearly 50% more weight than those on Wegovy in first head-to-head study

    People taking Eli Lilly’s obesity drug, Zepbound, lost nearly 50% more weight than those using rival Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy in the first head-to-head study of the blockbuster medications.

    Clinical trial participants who took tirzepatide, the drug sold as Zepbound, lost an average of 50 pounds (22.8 kilograms) over 72 weeks, while those who took semaglutide, or Wegovy, lost about 33 pounds (15 kilograms). That’s according to the study funded by Lilly, which was published Sunday in the New England Journal of Medicine.

    Both drugs are part of a new class of medications that work by mimicking hormones in the gut and brain that regulate appetite and feelings of fullness. But tirzepatide targets two such hormones, known as GLP-1 and GIP, while semaglutide targets GLP-1 alone, said Dr. Louis Aronne, director of the Comprehensive Weight Control Center at Weill Cornell Medicine.

    “Two drugs together can produce better weight loss,” said Aronne, who led the study and presented the findings Sunday at the European Congress on Obesity in Spain.

    While tirzepatide won out in what Aronne said many view as “a drag race of efficacy,” both are important tools for treating obesity, which affects about 40% of American adults.

    “The point of these medications is to improve health,” he said. “The majority of people won’t need the most effective medication.”

    The trial included 751 people from across the U.S. who were overweight or had obesity and at least one other weight-related health problem, but not diabetes. Participants received weekly injections of the highest tolerated doses of Zepbound, either 10 milligrams or 15 milligrams, or Wegovy, 1.7 milligrams or 2.4 milligrams.

    By the end of the trial, those who took Zepbound lost about 20% of their body weight on average, compared with a nearly 14% loss for those who took Wegovy. The tirzepatide group trimmed about 7 inches (17.8 centimeters) from their waist circumference, compared to about 5 inches (12.7 centimeters) with semaglutide. In addition, nearly 32% of people taking Zepbound lost at least a quarter of their body weight, compared to about 16% of those taking Wegovy, the study found.

    Weight loss was about 6% lower in men than in women in both groups, the authors noted. As participants in both groups lost more weight, they saw improvements in health markers such as blood pressure, blood fat and blood sugar levels.

    More than three-quarters of patients taking both drugs reported at least one side effect, mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal issues such as nausea, constipation, diarrhea and vomiting. About 6% of participants taking Zepbound left the trial because of adverse events, compared with 8% of those taking semaglutide.

    The GLP-1 drugs have become increasingly popular, with at least 1 in 8 U.S. adults reporting their use, according to a 2024 survey by KFF, a independent health policy research organization. Zepbound generated $4.9 billion in global sales last year. Wegovy brought in nearly $8.8 billion (58.2 billlion Danish kroner).

    Access and affordability have limited wider use of the drugs. Tirzepatide and semaglutide were removed recently from a list of drug shortages by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Both manufacturers recently released programs that cut costs to about $500 per month or less, depending on the dose.

    Other factors can affect access. This week, CVS Health said Wegovy will become the preferred option on its standard formulary, or list of covered drugs, as of July 1. Zepbound will be excluded.

    It’s important to have a range of drugs to treat a disease as widespread as obesity in the U.S., said Dr. Angela Fitch, chief medical officer of knownwell, an obesity care company. Wegovy has been found to cut the risk of serious heart problems by 20%, she noted. A drug may work well for one patient, but not for others.

    “We’re going to need to use them all just because we have so many patients who need treatment,” she added.

    This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

  • A bonus from the shingles vaccine: Dementia protection?

    A study released on Wednesday finds that a live-virus vaccine that limits shingles symptoms was associated with a drop in the risk for dementia when it was introduced. The work took advantage of the fact that the National Health Service Wales made the vaccine available with a very specific age limit, essentially creating two populations, vaccinated and unvaccinated, separated by a single date. And these populations showed a sharp divide in how often they were diagnosed with dementia, despite having little in the way of other differences in health issues or treatments.

    What a day

    This study didn’t come out of nowhere. There have been a number of hints recently that members of the herpesvirus family that can infect nerve cells are associated with dementia. That group includes Varicella zoster, the virus that causes both chicken pox and—potentially many years after— shingles, an extremely painful rash. And over the past couple of years, observational studies have suggested that the vaccine against shingles may have a protective effect.

    But it’s extremely difficult to do a clinical trial given that the onset of dementia may happen decades after most people first receive the shingles vaccine. That’s why the use of NHS Wales data was critical. When the first attenuated virus vaccine for shingles became available, it was offered to a subset of the Welsh population. Those who were born on or after September 2, 1933, were eligible to receive the vaccine. Anyone older than that was permanently ineligible.

    Read full article

    Comments

  • 9 ways living in space changes the human body

    smiling butch wilmore and suni williams floating laying in a white circular tunnel around a port in the space station
    Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams inside the vestibule between the space station and Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft.

    • Scientists are learning what short and long-duration space missions do to human bodies.
    • Some changes are common like a puffier face, bone loss, and less sleep.
    • Here are nine ways the harsh conditions of space can change the human body.

    Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore returned to Earth on Tuesday after spending nine months in space.

    The two were stranded on the International Space Station after their Boeing spaceship malfunctioned and they had to wait for a SpaceX spaceship to become available to bring them home.

    Nine months in space isn’t a record by any means, but it’s long enough that Williams and Wilmore likely saw some changes to their bodies during their time on the ISS.

    As with any astronaut, “there’s a muscular and cardiovascular reconditioning that has to happen,” Steve Stich, tk, said in a briefing after the duo splashed down in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Much of what scientists are learning about how space affects the human body comes from NASA’s research on astronauts staying on the ISS, like its Twins Study: a research program involving former NASA astronaut Scott Kelly, who lived in space for nearly a year, and his identical twin brother, Mark, who lived on the ground at the same time.

    Indeed, Stich said, “every single crew member that we fly in orbit, we collect medical research data,” including drawing blood, measuring bone density, and testing vision multiple times throughout their space mission.

    The lack of gravity, higher radiation exposure, space-compatible diet, and other facts of life in orbit affected Scott’s body in significant and surprising ways. While Wilmore and Williams weren’t in space for as long as Scott, they likely experienced similar changes though perhaps not as extreme.

    Here are nine biological oddities that researchers have found might happen to your body if you live in space for a long time.

    Your body fluids shift.

    space_7

    When you orbit Earth, you’re effectively in free-fall around the planet, and weightless. This means there’s nothing to force blood and other bodily fluids toward your feet. The fluid shifting from your legs to your head in a year could fill a 2 liter bottle.

    Your face looks different.

    space_6

    With less gravity, a lot of liquids move toward and into your head — so your face looks puffy.

    Your sight could change.

    space_5

    For the same reason that your face puffs out, your vision might get worse due to pressure changes in the brain. Fluids near the optic nerve can push on the back of the eyeball.

    Deep-space radiation might also promote cataracts and impair eyesight. Even high-flying commercial-airline workers face that risk because of the thinner atmosphere.

    Your bone density can change.

    space_1

    If you don’t exercise while in space, you could lose about 12% of your bone density in a year. Researchers are still trying to understand why this happens, though it seems to be related to how microgravity affects the tissues that makeup bones and bone cell behavior.

    “The cells that build new bone slow down, while the cells that break down old or damaged bone tissue keep operating at their normal pace so that breakdown outpaces growth, producing weaker and more brittle bones,” NASA says.

    You get taller — until you get back to Earth.

    space_4

    Since gravity isn’t pushing you down, fluid-filled discs between each of the bony vertebrae in your spine don’t get compressed, stretching your height by about 3%. After Scott Kelly’s time in space, he returned 2 inches taller than his twin brother. But returning to Earth-like gravity reverses that effect.

    Your muscles can shrink.

    space_3

    You don’t need muscles when you’re weightless, so they atrophy and absorb the extra tissue. This is why physical exercise is a part of every astronaut’s schedule. But nothing seems to maintain muscle mass better than the strain of living in the gravity found at Earth’s surface.

    You’ll be sleepy.

    space_2

    You’d probably be sleep-deprived. Most astronauts only get 6 hours a night because sleeping in space feels weird.

    Your cancer risk increases.

    space_8

    Radiation bombarding your body outside of Earth’s protective magnetic field can increase your risk of getting cancer.

    NASA currently limits astronauts’ lifetime radiation exposure to 3,250 millisieverts for males, which is equivalent to about 400 CT scans of the abdomen.

    Female astronauts typically have more tissue that’s susceptible to radiation, so their lifetime limit is 2,500 mSv. 

    Animal research suggests this threat could be worse in deep space than previously thought, though studies involving humans are needed to confirm that’s also true for astronauts.

    Your genetic code behaves differently.

    genetic-code-behaves-differently-in-space

    DNA is life’s basic blueprint, and genes — much like words in a cookbook — spell out the specific recipes to keep us alive. However, it’s equally important when and how much those genes are expressed, or turned on and off. A lot of that has to do with a person’s environment.

    The Twins Study found that about 7% of Scott Kelly’s genes expressed a bit differently after a year in space than they did on the ground, and didn’t return to normal (or at least not quickly). The real-world ramifications of this are still being explored.

    What if you die in space?

    space walk floating iss astronaut

    No one has ever died on the ISS. The farther humans travel from Earth, however, and the longer time they spend in space, the greater the risk is that someone could die from a medical event, a vehicle emergency like a fire, depressurization, electrical shock, or simply a lack of food and water.

    According to NASA, if someone were to die in space one of the most immediate concerns would be how to ensure the safety of the rest of the crew.

    “In the closed atmosphere of a space vehicle, the natural byproducts of decomposition and/or potential pathogens released during the decomposition process could contaminate the enclosed vehicle environment,” NASA explains in a technical brief from 2024.

    If the crew is close to Earth, like on the ISS, there are a few options, NASA says: return the body to Earth, place it in a safe orbit around Earth, or allow it to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere.

    Ultimately, the final decision would have to take into account multiple factors including minimizing risk to surviving crewmembers, potential forensics collection, biohazard containment, and legal jurisdiction.

    If the crew are far from Earth, like on a mission to Mars, the option is to either try to preserve the body for return to Earth — which relies on the crew being able to handle the remains properly — or jettison the remains into space.

    Read the original article on Business Insider