Latest News “Stay informed with breaking news, world news, US news, politics, business, technology, and more at latest news.

Category: military

Auto Added by WPeMatico

  • Top general warns Marines that their cellphones could get them killed in new video pointing out Russian catastrophes

    A US Marine sends a text message to his comrades about his situation. It's a screengrab from a video.
    In this screengrab from a Marine Corps video on the dangers of cellphone usage, a Marine sends a message to his friends in battle. That has been deadly in Ukraine.

    • The top Marine Corps general issued a warning to troops about battlefield cellphone usage.
    • Cellphone data can reveal troop locations, making them vulnerable to enemy attacks.
    • The war in Ukraine highlights the dangers of cellphone use in a combat environment.

    The Marine Corps’ top general sent a video reminder out to the force this week, cautioning troops that battlefield cellphone usage can have deadly consequences. It points to Russian disasters in Ukraine.

    The video shared on social media shows a Marine who escaped enemy fire seeking refuge in an abandoned building. Assuming he’s safe, the Marine pulls out his phone to send a text asking for assistance, sending his location with it.

    What no one realizes in this exchange is that the messages were intercepted. As his fellow Marines come to his aid, an enemy strike hits, resulting in fatalities.

    The video then turns the discussion to the conflict in Ukraine, noting news headlines from the war about the weaponization of mobile phones, and how cellphone usage by Russian soldiers led to a deadly Ukrainian strike.

    The video references a devastating strike that killed scores of Russian troops in Makiivka at the end of 2022. Moscow blamed cellphone usage, but there appear to have been multiple factors involved. It still serves as a point of caution all the same.

    “If you can be sensed, you can be targeted,” Gen. Eric Smith, Commandant of the Marine Corps, said in the video. “And if you can be targeted, you can be killed.”

    While the Marine in the video shares his exact location, map coordinates are not needed for troops to endanger themselves or their comrades. When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russian troops posted videos on social media and called loved ones back home, all data that Ukraine used to strike.

    Phone calls, texts, and photos shared with friends over unprotected lines can be intercepted and mined for metadata, showing where they were taken. Open-source information gleaned from photos has been fatal in Ukraine.

    Russia has implemented several cellphone bans, and in 2024, Russia’s lower house of parliament proposed legislation that would punish troops for using their personal phones in battle.

    It’s not just phone usage that causes problems in combat; it’s unintentional signal emissions, too, like the phones pinging off cell towers. “The character of war continues to change,” Smith said. “The proliferation of technology has made signature management essential on the battlefield.”

    The Marine Corps released its most current official policy on cell phones in 2024, Capt. Stephanie Baer, a spokesperson, told Business Insider.

    She said “the posted video is an amplification and continual reminder of the importance of the policy on usage in all situations,” and added that the video’s release was not linked to any specific recent events.

    The idea of “signature management” has been a critical tenant of discipline on the battlefield, but it’s become increasingly important on modern battlefields where electronic emissions can betray positions and movements.

    A unit’s “signature” generally refers to its presence and how easily it can be detected. Light, noise levels, and movement can all be elements of signature management. But with the proliferation of cell phones, and social media, the idea of signature discipline is morphing into a more urgent concern.

    Smith isn’t the first Marine leader to warn about cellphones. Former Commandant Gen. David Berger noted such concerns about cellphone vulnerabilities to defense reporters in 2022.

    “We have to be distributed. You have to have enough mobility that you can relocate your unit pretty often,” he said of efforts to prepare for expeditionary operations throughout the Pacific. “You have to learn all about — like some of us learned 30 years ago — camouflage, decoys, deception,” he said.

    “What we didn’t worry so much about 30 years ago now is every time you press a button, you’re emitting,” he said.

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Defense tech firm BlueHalo’s CEO sees an opportunity for Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ project to be more than a missile shield

    An unarmed US Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile equipped with one re-entry vehicle launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base, California, June 4, 2024.
     

    • Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’ is a missile shield, though exactly what the project will look like is still a mystery.
    • Legacy and new defense companies are vying for opportunities within the ‘Golden Dome’ initiative.
    • There have been arguments for the project to focus on a range of threats beyond missiles.

    President Donald Trump envisions his “Golden Dome for America” as a next-generation missile shield, but defense companies see other opportunities amid the heightened focus on fending off threats to the homeland.

    What exactly the project will entail remains to be seen, but industry partners are curious to see if it will include less conventional systems like counter-drone capabilities and electronic warfare. The “Golden Dome” effort is being eyed closely by legacy defense companies and smaller, younger companies alike.

    Lockheed Martin, an established player in integrated missile defense, has said that it is “ready to answer the call.” Other big defense companies, like RTX and Northrop Grumman, have also shown their interest in the project. But other defense firms want a piece of the action as well.

    BlueHalo, a Virginia-based defense contractor, has said the project, which is already set to be a massive undertaking as the Trump administration effectively revives the Reagan-era Strategic Defense Initiative, will ultimately require “the full might of the Defense Industrial Base to achieve success.”

    In an interview with Business Insider, BlueHalo CEO Jonathan Moneymaker said that a comprehensive Golden Dome could become an all-encompassing threat response with buy-in from all areas of the defense tech and AI industries.

    BlueHalo develops cost-effective counter-drone systems, among other defense technologies. The company developed the Palletized High Energy Laser system that uses directed energy and AI to eliminate drones for the Army and is working on a next-generation counter-drone missile that it recently tested.

    ‘A very wide swath of threat vectors’

    Moneymaker said the defense industry will need greater clarity for companies to begin fielding potential “Golden Dome” solutions. Right now, there are still a lot of questions about the scale and how extensive the White House wants this to be.

    And those are not the only uncertainties. Agencies like NORTHCOM, Space Command, and the Missile Defense Agency may all have requirements and varying levels of ownership, raising responsibility questions. Leading agencies will also have to hash out how the potential inclusion of electronic warfare and signals intelligence will work on American soil and balance citizens’ privacy rights.

    A Standard Missile-6 Dual II is launched from the USS Daniel Inouye off the coast of the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii as part of testing event, March 30, 2023.
    A Standard Missile-6 Dual II is launched from the USS Daniel Inouye off the coast of the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii as part of testing event, March 30, 2023.

    Some of these issues are likely being addressed now as the first planning deadline fast approaches. In late January, the White House gave the Pentagon 60 days from the president’s executive order to develop a plan for the new shield.

    The executive order for what Trump initially called “Iron Dome for America” was focused on the threat of ballistic, hypersonic, and advanced cruise missiles. But it also mentioned without specificity “other next-generation aerial attacks.”

    The White House did not respond to Business Insider’s request for clarity on whether it would want the new project to focus on more than missile threats.

    Moneymaker said when it comes to the dangers the US is facing, there are “a lot of varying degrees of technology that are ranging from very unsophisticated threats to very, very sophisticated threats.”

    He said potential threats include everything from complex and maneuverable hypersonic missiles to cheap, off-the-shelf drones with munitions taped to them. The Ukraine war has seen the revolutionary employment of drones and loitering munitions. The threats to the nation can range from missiles to cyberattacks to drone swarms.

    “That is a very wide swath of threat vectors,” the CEO said.

    Former military officials have argued the original focus of the Trump administration’s shield project was too narrowly focused on missiles.

    Glen VanHerck, a retired Air Force General who previously served as the head of NORAD, and Pete Fesler, another retired Air Force general and former NORAD official, argued last month in The National Interest that plans for Trump’s “Golden Dome” are stuck in a bygone era focused primarily on legacy systems.

    The former military officials called for “a comprehensive and holistic approach to homeland defense — one that addresses the full spectrum of current and future threats.” That approach could include electronic warfare, cyber-resilience, and improved counter-drone capabilities.

    “The Pentagon cannot afford to simply buy more of yesterday. Instead, it must dynamically adapt for tomorrow,” they wrote.

    Getting to a fully operational Iron Dome within the US will be a heavy lift, one that demands organization and a “whole of government” approach.

    “This will be clearly a collaborative effort across a lot of players,” Moneymaker said. “Both government and industry alike.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Ukraine would struggle to defend itself if a cease-fire froze the front lines with Russia

    Ukrainian troops
    Ukrainian troops aim an artillery piece at Russian positions in Donetsk in March 2025.

    • Ukraine is exposed to future attacks if the front lines are frozen as part of a cease-fire deal.
    • Russia’s forces are close to Ukrainian cities, including Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.
    • To ensure a lasting cease-fire, Ukraine needs a front it can effectively defend, experts told BI.

    A cease-fire in Ukraine is moving closer to reality, but freezing the current front line with Russia would leave it vulnerable to another attack.

    As President Donald Trump is set to talk to Russian President Vladimir Putin later Tuesday, military experts warn that simply freezing the front lines as they stand would likely be a prelude to future conflict, not a lasting solution.

    This is especially true without security guarantees from the US or enough international peacekeepers to monitor and respond to renewed Russian aggression.

    There are few naturally defensible positions between the front line and major strategic targets, meaning the temptation for Russia to break a cease-fire deal and take advantage of Ukraine’s fragile defensive situation would be high.

    In an assessment on Sunday, the Institute for the Study of War said that “the current frontlines do not provide the strategic depth that Ukraine will need to reliably defend against renewed Russian aggression.”

    Bryden Spurling, a senior research leader with RAND Europe, told BI that the further west the front line is drawn, the worse for Ukraine given the concentration of strategically and economically vital centers near the front.

    “So there is a lot at stake in the position of any frozen lines of conflict for Ukraine’s future prospects — not just in defense, but economically,” he said.

    Russia’s grinding offensive

    Russia occupies about 20% of Ukraine, mostly in the south and east.

    The front line has shifted over the course of the three-year war. In recent months, Russia has been making incremental but steady gains.

    The ISW think tank said that Russian forces are close to several major cities. It said they’re just across the Dnipro River from Kherson City in south Ukraine, roughly 25 kilometers from Zaporizhzhia City in the east, and 30 kilometers from Kharkiv in the north.

    It added that the current front line, which is around 600 miles long, would be expensive to defend during a cease-fire, requiring a bigger Ukrainian military, and more support from Ukraine’s allies.

    A January report by the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations said that Ukraine could defend itself effectively by creating a “multilayered territorial defense system” that would involve a hardened defense perimeter, rapid-response forces, and enhanced protection for cities and critical infrastructure.

    It estimated that this would require about 550,000 active duty Ukrainian military personnel, not to mention another 450,000 in reserve, and would cost between $20-40 billion a year, “comparable to the defense budgets of Israel and South Korea.”

    However, it did point out that this was considerably less than the current wartime expenditures.

    To deter another Russian attack, Ukraine would need to lay extensive defensive lines of mines, trenches, and artillery, and guard them with enough troops to slow down an assault force so it could rush more resources in.

    Russia has also hit on a successful mix of weapons including glide bombs and exploding drones to advance against Ukraine, and could use a spell of months to rebuild its stocks.

    Spurling said that the shorter and less jagged a front line is, the easier it is to defend, and Ukraine would be seeking to draw the line to take advantage of geographical features that gives its defenders an advantage.

    “Done properly, it’s a complex undertaking,” he said.

    On Sunday, the ISW called for the US to back Ukraine in pushing back Russian forces and in establishing a front line along positions that can be more easily defended.

    “A ceasefire along more defensible positions would also place Russian forces in a more disadvantaged position for renewed offensive operations, making future Russian aggression less likely,” it said.

    Peace or fragile truce?

    Many specifics of a US-backed cease-fire deal remain unclear, if it indeed gets agreed to by both Russia and Ukraine.

    But whatever shape it takes, it’s unlikely that any deal that freezes the current front line will hold, Stefan Wolff, a professor of international security at the UK’s University of Birmingham, told BI.

    He also said that any deal would have to be strong enough to deter Russia from using a cease-fire to rearm and launch a new offensive. If the front line was frozen on its current lines, a strong enough security guarantee from the likes of the US could be a deterrent to Russia, he added.

    Measures being discussed by some allies include deploying European troops to back up a peace deal, something Russia opposes.

    “If Ukraine is properly armed and gets some sort of security guarantee, even badly fortified lines might become more defensible simply by virtue of the cost Ukraine could impose on Russia in the future,” Wolff said.

    Spurling added that Ukraine was likely to be more focused on obtaining security guarantees from its allies, rather than the demarcation of the front line.

    “If Europe or the US are truly willing to provide a genuine backstop in the case of Russian restarting conflict, then that would pose a major strategic dilemma to any future Russian ambitions in Ukraine,” he said, “and dramatically increase Ukraine’s capacity to absorb any new invasion.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Russia could ask for sanction relief as part of a cease-fire, allowing Putin to go on a military tech spree

    Kremlin officials tour weapon factory
    Russian officials visiting a weapons factory.

    • The US wants to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, starting with a 30-day cease-fire.
    • As part of a deal, Russia will likely seek sanctions relief.
    • Security analysts told BI that Russia could use any sanctions relief to quickly re-arm.

    With a 30-day US-brokered cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine on the table, the ball is now in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s court.

    As he considers the deal, Putin is likely preparing demands and conditions of his own — and US sanctions relief could be near the top of the list.

    US sanctions, imposed by the Biden administration, have dented the Russian economy and weakened its defense sector. President Donald Trump has signaled a willingness to discuss easing sanctions in his pursuit of a peace deal.

    But security and economic analysts told Business Insider that Russia would likely try to exploit sanctions relief to rapidly restock crucial US technology for its weapons industry.

    “It is unquestionable that Russia will take immediate advantage of any easing in sanctions that allows it to access the components it badly needs to replenish its dilapidated military,” said Tom Keatinge, director of the Royal United Services Institute’s Centre for Finance and Security.

    US and Russian Ukraine discussions
    US and Russian delegates discussed a Ukraine peace deal in Saudi Arabia in February 2025.

    Biden’s microchip ban

    According to Alexander Kolyandr, a non-resident senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, the lifting of tech sanctions will be near the top of the list for the Kremlin as it approaches negotiations with the US.

    “The issue of easing of the sanctions is clearly on the table,” he wrote last week.

    US-made microchips are crucial components in items ranging from fridges to planes, as well as military technology such as ballistic missiles and sophisticated drones.

    Then-President Joe Biden cut off Russia’s access to US microchips after its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Since then, Russia has been forced to obtain them through complex black market networks, or through its ally China.

    This has left Russia often unable to quickly repair or replace crucial weapons systems destroyed in the war.

    Janis Kluge, a senior associate at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told BI that Russia would be particularly keen to obtain sensors and components for advanced machinery, as well as airplane and drone parts.

    “It has been expensive and sometimes impossible for Russia to acquire these parts due to sanctions,” Kluge said.

    He added that “Russia knows now what it can’t replace and will make sure to build large stockpiles in case sanctions will be imposed again later on.”

    One effect could be to blunt the power of possible future sanctions against Russia, he said.

    President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the beginning of a meeting in Helsinki, Finland in July 2018.
    President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki in July 2018.

    Putin’s ambitions remain unchanged

    The exact shape of a possible Ukraine deal with Russia, and the future status of sanctions, remains unclear.

    Last week, Trump threatened to impose tougher sanctions on Russia over its bombardments of Ukraine. But this came after the US president announced the freezing of military aid to Kyiv after a tense Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    Keatinge warned that whatever form a deal between Trump and Putin over Ukraine might take, the Russian president’s core goal will likely remain unchanged: To rebuild and seize more territory.

    Maintaining sanctions is therefore crucial, he said.

    “Anyone who thinks that Putin’s aggression in Europe will be satisfied by any sort of deal over Ukraine is sorely mistaken,” Keatinge added. “Appeasing Putin now hastens the possibility that Russian tanks cross the border into the Baltic states and Poland.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • The US military is woefully unprepared for the catastrophic casualties of a major Pacific war

    An Army soldier looks out from a MH-60 Blackhawk helicopter in Hawaii.
    In a high-intensity great-power conflict in the Pacific, the numbers of wounded streaming into the US would be overwhelming for the US military healthcare system, healthcare experts said.

    • US military healthcare is unprepared for high numbers of wounded in a potential Pacific conflict.
    • The National Disaster Medical System needs revitalization to boost military-civilian medical ties.
    • US military experiences in combat casualty care over the past two decades won’t translate.

    There are a lot of unknowns when it comes to great-power war, but one thing is fairly certain: the casualties would be horrific.

    The US military’s healthcare system, however, is woefully unprepared to handle the numbers of wounded that could come with large-scale, high-intensity combat against a major military power like China in the Pacific, military health experts told Congress on Tuesday.

    “The Military Health System does not have the capacity to care for every casualty,” Paul Friedrichs, a retired Air Force general and former Joint Staff Surgeon, said of the high numbers of wounded troops who would stream back to the US from war.

    The Pentagon did not respond to Business Insider’s request for comment in time for publication.

    Getting the US military healthcare system better prepared and developing the much-needed relationships with civilian medical institutions before it’s too late is going to be a very heavy lift, Friedrichs and others told the Senate Armed Services Committee. He added that the current challenges are more than it can handle.

    “We don’t have the capacity to care for the people in peacetime right now,” he said, arguing that “to think that somehow we can do this on our own is another mistaken belief.”

    A healthcare program desperately in need of attention

    Friedrichs touted the usefulness of the National Disaster Medical System, originally created to boost national casualty preparedness in the event of large-scale warfare by increasing interoperability between military and civilian medical facilities.

    But the program has been overlooked for years and now needs drastic attention as part of a broader national medical effort.

    “We’re short 300,000 nurses nationally. The projections are we will be short 130,000 doctors by 2035. There is no way that we can do this individually,” Freidrichs said.

    A medevac training exercise sees US soldiers moving a "wounded" soldier to a helicopter.
    Soldiers practice transporting a casualty to a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter.

    When the NDMS was originally created in the Cold War era, lawmakers realized that a war effort could not rely solely on the military’s healthcare system, Friedrichs said. Rather, it would need to be augmented with the veteran’s health administration and civilian partners, including hospitals and academic institutions.

    Such partnerships have fallen to the wayside, the panel said.

    “We need to put our foot on the gas,” echoed retired Air Force Colonel Jeremy W. Cannon, a professor of surgery at the University of Pennsylvania, noting “we don’t have five years, 10 years, 20 years. We need the solution really now.”

    “No one in the DoD truly owns combat casualty care,” he added, making it harder for the military to even begin to better prepare.

    The US military can’t count solely on the systems that supported it in recent wars

    That military healthcare experts have expressed such concerns about combat casualty care may come as a surprise to some after two decades of war in the Middle East.

    During the height of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, American air supremacy and regional support infrastructure meant troops could often be evacuated for higher-level medical care within the “golden hour” window.

    But the logistics of warfare, including triage for the injured, is poised to be dizzyingly complex in the Pacific, especially as the US faces a severe shortage of ships. The US has just two hospital ships that are in need of replacement.

    And that’s not even factoring in threats posed by enemy activity.

    Adding to the complexity is that the military’s health system remains siloed in their healthcare operations and training, without a truly meaningful “joint” approach to healthcare, said Friedrichs.

    Jointness helps various parts of the military more easily work together, and creates standardization that can make fighting wars and taking care of the wounded easier and more effective.

    And the challenges don’t stop there. Just 10% of military general surgeons are receiving the patient volume and variety needed to keep their medical skills sharp and prepared for combat injuries. In the absence of active warfare and without sufficient training opportunities to work in facilities like civilian emergency rooms or other surgical facilities, medical skills are becoming rusty.

    “We’re actively falling into the trap of the peacetime effect,” Cannon said, noting that in a Pacific war, the US military could see up to 1,000 troops killed and wounded each day for months, overwhelming the systems in place. Neither the military health system nor the civilian sector could absorb such extreme numbers in their current capacities.

    “Many of these patients will have survivable injuries,” Cannon said. “Yet one in four will die at the hands of an unprepared system.”

    Read the original article on Business Insider
  • Why dismantling USAID could have deadly consequences

    The Trump administration has frozen foreign aid and killed USAID programs that administer humanitarian assistance across the world. We break down what this means for global stability in a video collaboration between Politico and Business Insider.

    Read the original article on Business Insider