Latest News “Stay informed with breaking news, world news, US news, politics, business, technology, and more at latest news.

Category: Ryzen

Auto Added by WPeMatico

  • AMD CPUs should support CUDIMM memory soon, but not this generation

    AMD processors can’t make full use of CUDIMM memory just yet, but it may well do before the end of this socket. In a recent interview with DigitalTrends, AMD’s product management lead for gaming and workstations, Sourabh Dhir, told us that there was no reason that AM5 couldn’t support CUDIMM, but wouldn’t be draw on a timeline of when we might see it.

    Considering we expect AM5 to be AMD’s flagship CPU socket for the next couple of generations at least, that probably means we don’t have long to wait for the added memory speed support.

    What is CUDIMM?

    CUDIMM is the latest memory DIMM standard that adds an onboard clock tuner to the memory modules themselves. It’s an evolution of DDR5’s original advance in power management, incorporating that onto the sticks themselves. What CUDIMM does, is add a chip that boosts the clock signal from the CPU’s memory controller, delivering a clearer signal for the memory. That leads to greater stability, and ultimately, higher memory frequencies. 

    It’s meant that companies like G-Skill have launched memory with rated speeds as high as 9,600 MT/s, and often they can be overclocked to over 10,000 MT/s on air, or even over 12,000 MT/s when more exotic cooling is involved.

    The only problem for AMD is, its CPUs don’t currently support it. Or at least, the onboard clock tuner which allows for such advanced frequencies. Currently, if you plug a stick of CUDIMM into an AMD motherboard, even a high-end, latest generation X870E board, it’ll run in what’s known as “bypass mode,” and will only operate at the highest speed the motherboard supports — not the rated speed on the modules.

    Intel’s latest Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake processors, however, can fully support it, leaving AMD somewhat languishing on memory speed, even if it isn’t some game changing performance silver bullet.

    When will AMD get CUDIMM support?

    Not yet, but probably not far into the future, either. In our chat with Mr Dhir, he was clear that AM5 was more than capable of supporting CUDIMM’s features and subsequently, its frequencies.

    “So as as our memory road map is developing, you’ll notice that different different innovations are leading to different form factors on the DIMMS. CUDIMM is a technology which allows our DDR5 speeds to go beyond 6000 speeds, and I don’t think we we need a new infrastructure to support these.”

    When pressed on whether this was something that could be enabled in a BIOS update, or if it would need a new chipset and processor generation (even if not a new socket), here merely confirmed:

    “Within the same AM5 infrastructure,” he clarified. “It’s robust enough. It’s future proof enough, and it’s built for for supporting these [developments].”

    His final send off on the topic suggested this might not be the last we hear of either CUDIMM support, or additional DDR5 capabilities and features beyond it.

    “Anything you throw DDR5 at it, [AM5 is] built to support these capabilities.”

    Before AM6

    Elsewhere in our chat, Dhir suggested that the major motivation for AMD changing sockets was to improve memory support and capabilities. 

    “When DDR5 came into market, we wanted to adopt that technology early,” he said. “We wanted to give the benefits of that, improved bandwidth, improved memory capabilities.” 

    He went on to suggest that DDR6 may well be the driving factor of AMD moving on to an AM6 or other future socket design in the future, though wouldn’t be drawn on specifics. This would very much suggest that we’re going to see CUDIMM support this side of moving to DDR6 and AM6, but with no clear roadmap as to when beyond that far future “before” date.

    Offering another little nugget of hope in this conversation was AMD PR manager, Matthew Hurwitz, who spent time working at Gigabyte in the past. While he was clear to state that he wasn’t speaking for his old employer, he did want to emphasise the inter-generation improvements of AMD chipsets, and how even when using the same socket, memory improvements were common.

    CUDIMM for AMD isn’t here just yet, but it feels that bit closer to me, after this chat.

  • Review: Ryzen AI CPU makes this the fastest the Framework Laptop 13 has ever been

    At this point, the Framework Laptop 13 is a familiar face, an old friend. We have reviewed this laptop five other times, and in that time, the idea of a repairable and upgradeable laptop has gone from a “sounds great if they can pull it off” idea to one that’s become pretty reliable and predictable. And nearly four years out from the original version—which shipped with an 11th-generation Intel Core processor—we’re at the point where an upgrade will get you significant boosts to CPU and GPU performance, plus some other things.

    We’re looking at the Ryzen AI 300 version of the Framework Laptop today, currently available for preorder and shipping in Q2 for people who buy one now. The laptop starts at $1,099 for a pre-built version and $899 for a RAM-less, SSD-less, Windows-less DIY version, and we’ve tested the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 version that starts at $1,659 before you add RAM, an SSD, or an OS.

    This board is a direct upgrade to Framework’s Ryzen 7040-series board from mid-2023, with most of the same performance benefits we saw last year when we first took a look at the Ryzen AI 300 series. It’s also, if this matters to you, the first Framework Laptop to meet Microsoft’s requirements for its Copilot+ PC initiative, giving users access to some extra locally processed AI features (including but not limited to Recall) with the promise of more to come.

    Read full article

    Comments

  • The 9950X3D gives the gaming king a real run for its money

    AMD’s CPUs are the kings of gaming in 2025, with Intel’s latest-generation Arrow Lake CPUs performing worse than their 14th generation counterparts. But if you’re trying to pick the best CPU for gaming, then AMD’s 9800X3D and 9950X3D are a tough choice to pick between. The former is far more affordable, but it also misses out on eight full-size Zen 5 cores and a lot of extra multi-threading performance.

    Does that make much of a difference in gaming, though? Let’s find out.

    Pricing and availability

    AMD launched the Ryzen 9800X3D in November 2024, a few months after the debut of the Ryzen 9000 generation of CPUs. Its launch price was $479 and besides a brief spike after it initially went on sale, it’s maintained that price ever since.

    AMD announcing the 9950X3D.
    AMD

    The 9950X3D launched in March 2025 with a suggested price of $699. However, its popularity has made it hard to find, meaning it’s often out of stock and prices have risen in turn. At the time of writing, it’s available at major retailers for around $835.

    Specifications

    Ryzen 7 9800X3D Ryzen 9 9950X3D
    Architecture Zen 5 Zen 5
    Cores/Threads 8/16 16/32
    L3/L2 Cache 96MB / 8MB 128MB / 16MB
    Base frequency 4.7GHz 4.3GHz
    Max turbo frequency 5.2GHz 5.7GHz
    Socket AM5 AM5
    Max temperature 95°C 95°C
    TDP 120W 170W

    It’s clear looking at the specifications that the 9950X3D is the big brother of the comparatively-humble 9800X3D. It has double the cores and thread support, more L3 cache, a higher clock speed, and a higher TDP to go along with it. However, this is all fair enough considering the 9950X3D is close to double the price of its eight-core counterpart.

    Outside of extremely well optimized games, too, the 9950X3D doesn’t showcase much of anything in this spec table which would give it a big advantage in gaming, which is what these CPUs are primarily designed to do. The extra boost clock mighth come into play, but that’s more likely a single core boost. When all its cores are at work it’ll run closer to 5GHz.

    Performance

    We did review the 9800X3D when it launched last year, so if you want some detailed results from us on how that chip performs, check out our in-depth testing. However, we haven’t had a chance to play with the 9950X3D yet, so we’ll be looking to extensive third-party results to see how well it performs and compares to the gaming king 9800X3D.

    First, we’ll cover gaming, and as expected the 9950X3D is amazing. How amazing? About as amazing as the 9800X3D, it turns out. In TechPowerUp’s coverage, the two CPUs trade blows at 1080p across a range of games, and the differences between them are even less distinct at 1440p and 4K.

    Generational performance for AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
    AMD

    Overall, the 9800X3D ends up slightly faster across its suite of games, but only by a couple of percent, and even then it really depends on the games you play. It’s a real toss up in gaming.

    TomsHardware reports very similar results in gaming, but when switching to productivity workloads like Handbrake video encoding or Blender rendering, showcases the additional power those eight extra cores can bring to the table. With 16 cores and its higher overall clock speed, the 9950X3D blows the 9800X3D away, and even manages to eclipse the 9950X at a times, as well as giving the Intel 285K a run for its money.

    It seems that in certain apps, the added cache on the 9950X3D gives it a leg up over its X3D-less counterparts.

    Productivity performance for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
    AMD

    GamersNexus confirmed the same kind of results, finding the 9950X3D to be about the fastest chip you can find in almost any category. It’s the best at gaming, except when the 9800X3D just pips it at the post. It’s also extremely capable in professional workloads, often trading places with the Intel 285K and it shows clear advantages over the 9950X at times — that’s a major achievement for AMD, and its 7950X3D often fell well behind the 7950X in demanding multithreaded workloads.

    Buy the 9800X3D for pure gaming

    If you’re just in it for the frames in your games, the 9800X3D is by far the better buy. It offers the same, or even slightly-better performance than the 9950X3D and it’s available in greater quantities at around half the price. If you can’t make use of those extra eight cores in more demanding workloads, then there really is no need to pay for them.

    Similarly, while the 9950X3D is great for content creation and productivity workloads, it’s about as good as the 9950X in most cases. There are certain applications and programs where the extra 3D V-Cache does give it a slight edge, but we’re talking about shading a second or two off a 40 second render run. You aren’t going to notice a huge difference. With the 9950X and Intel Core Ultra 285K 200-300 dollars cheaper, too, it’s easy to recommend those alternatives if you’re just looking to do professional work on your new PC.

    If, however, you’re that rare breed of PC builder who wants a powerful gaming machine and render machine in one, then the 9950X3D is by far the best option. It’s blazing fast in gaming and in productivity workloads, making it the best general purpose CPU out there. You just need to pay for the privilege.

  • CPUs to buy instead of the Ryzen 9950X3D

    amd ryzen 9 9950x 9900x review 5

    Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

    The AMD Ryzen 9950X3D is the best all-round processor in the world. It’s the top of the pile for gaming and it’s competitive with the best of the best for productivity. But it is expensive, and even then it’s so popular it’s out of stock almost everywhere at the time of writing. You don’t have to wait for that to change, though. There are some excellent alternative CPUs worth considering.

    Here are some CPUs to buy instead of the 9950X3D.

    amd ryzen 7 9800x3d review 3

    Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

    Ryzen 9800X3D

    Pros
    • Exceptional productivity gains
    • Fully unlocked for overclocking
    • Supports existing AM5 motherboards
    • Still very efficient
    Cons
    • Single-digit gaming gains
    • More expensive than the previous generation

    If you’re predominantly looking for a new CPU for gaming, the 9800X3D is arguably a better buy over the 9950X3D, anyway. It’s much cheaper, has comparable gaming performance — and even beats the 9950X3D in some games — and uses less power. You do miss out on the sky-high productivity performance, but it’s not like it’s bad. Eight Zen 5 cores with 3D V-Cache (with overclocking, if you want to go down that route) are still very quick for a whole range of tasks.

    Gaming is where this chip really excels though, and outside of the 9950X3D, there’s nothing that can compete with it. Save yourself some money and grab a more powerful graphics card. Your FPS will thank you.

    AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
    Ryzen 9800X3D
    Best for gaming

    intel core ultra 9 285k review 1

    Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

    Pros
    • Insane efficiency improvements
    • Delivers multi-threaded performance gains without Hyper-Threading
    • Runs very cool in games
    • A lot of headroom for CPU and memory overclocking
    Cons
    • Gaming performance struggles
    • Inconsistent productivity performance
    • High-end memory required for best experience

    The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K isn’t an amazing CPU for gaming, but it’s very impressive for productivity workloads. Video editing? A cinch. Blender rendering? Crazy fast. Video transcoding? Over in an instant. With 24 cores, there’s nothing that can quite match the 285K when it comes to most demanding workloads. It’s just very unimpressive at gaming, so this isn’t a CPU for working in the day and gaming in your off hours. There are better options for that below.

    But for pure working, the 285K is an excellent choice. It’s far more efficient than its predecessors, and has support for advanced features like Thunderbolt 5 and Wi-Fi 7.

    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
    Best for productivity

    amd ryzen 9 9950x 9900x review 5

    Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

    AMD Ryzen 9950X

    Pros
    • Compatible with existing AM5 motherboards
    • Steals Intel’s performance crown in productivity apps
    • More efficient than Zen 4
    • Dedicated 512-bit data path for AVX-512
    Cons
    • Little to no performance gains
    • Last-gen Zen 4 options are much cheaper

    If you want a high performing CPU for work but don’t want to jump camps to Intel, the AMD 9950X is an equally great option. It has 16 full-size Zen 5 cores, giving it fantastic multi-threaded performance — and it’s pretty nippy for games too. It won’t keep up with any recent generation X3D options, but it’s still a cutting-edge, flagship CPU. It’s plenty fast.

    But it’s in demanding professional workloads where this CPU really stretches its legs. It can compete with the Intel 285K just about everywhere and it has a future upgrade path, as AMD will continue to support the AM5 socket for at least one more generation, possibly two.

    AMD Ryzen™ 9 9950X
    AMD Ryzen 9950X
    Best AMD CPU for productivity

    amd ryzen 9 7950x3d review 1

    Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

    AMD Ryzen 7950X3D

    Pros
    • Chart-topping gaming performance
    • More efficient than base Ryzen 9 7950X
    • Productivity performance keeps pace
    • Unlocked for overclocking
    Cons
    • Expensive
    • AM5 is still a costly upgrade

    If you want that do-it-all feel from your CPU, with cutting-edge gaming performance and plenty of high-performance cores for professional workloads, then the only real alternative to the new king, is the last-gen king: The 7950X3D.

    This CPU still has 16 cores, though they’re the slower Zen 4 type with lower clock speeds due to first-generation V-Cache. But it’s still 16 cores and you still get that V-Cache, so this CPU is in the running for one of the fastest gaming CPUs in the world, and its productivity performance can keep up with some of the much newer alterantives.

    It’s still expensive, but this is a processor that’s blazing fast in almost any setting and it’s pretty efficient, too.

    AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D 16-Core, 32-Thread Desktop Processor
    AMD Ryzen 7950X3D
    The best equivalent

  • Ryzen 9 9950X3D review: AMD irons out nearly every single downside of 3D V-Cache

    Even three years later, AMD’s high-end X3D-series processors still aren’t a thing that most people need to spend extra money on—under all but a handful of circumstances, your GPU will be the limiting factor when you’re running games, and few non-game apps benefit from the extra 64MB chunk of L3 cache that is the processors’ calling card. They’ve been a reasonably popular way for people with old AM4 motherboards to extend the life of their gaming PCs, but for AM5 builds, a regular Zen 4 or Zen 5 CPU will not bottleneck modern graphics cards most of the time.

    But high-end PC building isn’t always about what’s rational, and people spending $2,000 or more to stick a GeForce RTX 5090 into their systems probably won’t worry that much about spending a couple hundred extra dollars to get the fastest CPU they can get. That’s the audience for the new Ryzen 9 9950X3D, a 16-core, Zen 5-based, $699 monster of a processor that AMD begins selling tomorrow.

    If you’re only worried about game performance (and if you can find one), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the superior choice, for reasons that will become apparent once we start looking at charts. But if you want fast game performance and you need as many CPU cores as you can get for other streaming or video production or rendering work, the 9950X3D is there for you. (It’s a little funny to me that this a chip made almost precisely for the workload of the PC building tech YouTubers who will be reviewing it.)  It’s also a processor that Intel doesn’t have any kind of answer to.

    Read full article

    Comments