Latest News “Stay informed with breaking news, world news, US news, politics, business, technology, and more at latest news.

Category: waterproof speakers

Auto Added by WPeMatico

  • JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: Which portable speaker fits your style?

    One look at our list of the best Bluetooth speakers, and you can see that JBL exerts a dominant influence. The company seems to have an unerring sense of what people want when it comes to portability and sound quality. Within the sub-$200 category, its latest model is the Flip 7, and it brings greater ruggedness and lossless audio to an already proven formula.

    But for Sonos fans — or those who may be thinking of starting a Sonos-based whole-home sound system — the company’s Roam 2 speaker feels like a very tempting alternative. After all, why buy a standalone Bluetooth portable when you get a Bluetooth speaker that also integrates with the rest of your Wi-Fi based speakers?

    Still, the choice might not be as simple as that. With big differences in battery life, power, and extras, determining which of these speakers makes more sense requires a close look at their strengths and weaknesses. Fortunately, we’ve done the heavy lifting for you.

    JBL Flip 7

    Buy at Amazon

    Sonos Roam 2

    Buy at Best Buy

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: Price

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The Flip 7, as the latest generation of its series, has yet to see any discounts on its $150 regular price. This could change in time, but likely not while JBL is getting rid of its remaining Flip 6 inventory.

    Meanwhile, Sonos’ Roam 2 has rarely seen discounts on its $179 regular price, despite now being about one year old. That’s typical for Sonos as a brand — it tends to stick to its guns on pricing, only offering discounts a few times a year.

    There are good reasons why the Roam 2 costs more, but there’s no denying that the Flip 7 is the more affordable choice, and will likely become more affordable as time goes on.

    Winner: Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: Specs comparison

    JBL Flip 7 Sonos Roam 2
    Colors Black, Blue, Squad, White, Red Black, White, Sunset, Wave, Olive
    Weight 1.23 pounds 0.95 pounds
    Dimensions 2.8 x 7.19 x 2.7 inches 2.44 x 6.61 x 2.36 inches
    Charging cable included No Yes
    Battery Life Up to 16 hours Up to 10 hours
    Charging input USB-C USB-C, Qi wireless
    Charging output None None
    Drop-proof Tested 1 meter onto concrete No
    Water/dust resistance IP68 IP67
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
    Additional features
    • Stereo pairing and Multispeaker sharing (via Bluetooth Auracast)
    • USB Audio
    • Swappable attachments
    • Preset and manual EQ adjustments
    • Stereo pairing and Multispeaker sharing (via Sonos app, only on Wi-Fi)
    • Amazon Alexa built-in (Wi-Fi only)
    • Apple AirPlay (Wi-Fi only)
    • Sonos Voice Control (Bluetooth and Wi-Fi)
    • Automatic TruePlay tuning
    • Bass/treble adjustments

    From a specs perspective, the Sonos Roam 2 goes the extra mile, especially on things like wireless charging and smart, Wi-Fi based features like voice commands. Still, the JBL Flip 7 holds it own (and then some) on USB Audio, battery life, and ruggedness. Those last two areas should get special consideration given that we’re talking about speakers designed to anywhere and everywhere.

    The Flip 7 is a tad more waterproof than the Roam 2 at IP68 versus IP67. However, neither speaker will float, so it’s fair to say they’re best kept beside the pool, not in the pool.

    When on-the-go, a portable speakers is only as good as its battery life. This gives the Flip 7 a big advantage, with a normal 14-hour endurance that can be extended to 16 hours via the JBL Portables app’s Playtime Boost mode. That compares to the Roam 2’s 10-hour life. That’s still good for most of a day, but it’s not in the same league as the Flip 7.

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The Roam 2’s wireless charging is handy for home use, keeping it ready for travel without keeping it plugged in via the USB-C port. The Flip 7 has no such option, but it can use its USB-C port for power and lossless audio.  The Roam 2 can also do lossless audio, but only via Wi-Fi, and only when using the Sonos app or Tidal Connect. It has no way to pipe-in external audio sources.

    Both speakers let you create a stereo pair when you have two of the same models on hand, it’s just that the Roam 2 can only do this when at home on your Wi-Fi network. Same thing goes for multispeaker audio sharing: The Flip 7 can share a synchronized feed with any other Auracast-enabled JBL speakers, including the Flip 7, Charge 6, Xtreme 4, and several of its newer Party Box models. The Roam 2 can only do this with other Sonos speakers over Wi-Fi. When it comes to powering a party away from home, this is a big consideration.

    It’s worth noting that Apple users will appreciate the Roam 2’s AirPlay capability, but once again, you’ll need to be on Wi-Fi to use it.

    Do you need a portable speaker to also act as smart speaker when at home? Probably not, but it can be a very handy feature especially if you’re an Amazon Alexa fan. The Roam 2 is also the most affordable way to add voice control to an existing Sonos system.

    It’s hard not to reach the conclusion that the Roam 2 is a smarter, more connected speaker, but if we’re judging these speakers by their ability to provide music while away from home — which is why most people buy highly portable Bluetooth speakers — the Flip 7 delivers more of the features needed to do so. A bigger battery and a much more rugged build being the key ingredients.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: Design

    JBL Flip 7, close-up.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Though they’re both designed to be portable Bluetooth speakers, the Flip 7 and Roam 2 interpret this mission differently from a design point of view.

    The oversized JBL logo is hardly subtle (same goes for the exclamation marks on the passive bass radiators). You can use it horizontally or vertically, and the controls are easy to access in either orientation.

    It’s JBL’s drop-proofing and rugged woven fibre exterior (with hefty rubber bumpers at each end) that makes the Flip 7 stand out as travel companion. The Roam 2, with its all-plastic grille and rubberized end caps will likely fare better when it comes to accidental drops and bumps than the Beats Pill (another Flip 7 alternative), but it’s clearly not as trail or party-proof as the Flip 7.

    On the other hand, the Roam 2 is a bit smaller and noticeably lighter than the Flip 7, making it less cumbersome to tote around. Though the lack of any wrist strap is a confusing omission (there are no mounting loops either), especially when you consider the Flip 7’s swappable carry attachments.

    The Sonos Roam 2 laying horizontal on a table.
    Derek Malcolm / Digital Trends

    The Roam 2 has a decidedly more sophisticated look. The logo is more subtle and the plastic grille transitions seamlessly into the rest of the housing, for a sleek overall appearance. Where the Flip 7 tends to look like someone left a piece of sports equipment on the counter, the Roam 2 looks like it was made to compliment a variety of indoor settings.

    Like the Flip 7, you can use it in vertical or horizontal orientations, but the Roam 2’s controls are easier to see and use when the speaker is standing upright.

    That simplicity of shape, while beautiful to look at, loses something in the utility department. You’ll have to hold it in your hand or toss it in a bag when you leave the house. The Flip 7 has a carry loop and a carabiner that can be swapped in seconds thanks to its clever Pushlock system, giving you a variety of ways to carry, clip, or hang the speaker.

    The Flip 7 may not win any beauty pageants, but its rugged and versatile design makes it a much more capable companion.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: Sound quality

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    From a pure accuracy and detail point of view, the Sonos Roam 2 delivers a more nuanced performance than the Flip 7. There’s also a noticeably wider soundstage that helps music sound like it’s coming from outside of the speaker’s enclosure, instead from within. For its size, it gets surprisingly loud.

    But not even remotely as loud as the Flip 7. In fact, I had to crank the Roam 2 as high as 90% just to get close to the Flip 7 at 50%. Even then, the Roam couldn’t compete with the Flip’s bass output, which I could feel coming through my desk surface as I played them side-by-side indoors.

    Outdoors, it’s really no contest. If you had to pick one of these speakers to power a patio party, it would be the Flip 7, hands-down. As it gets louder, the sound can become more harsh — the Flip 7 is more of a machete to the Roam 2’s scalpel — but unless your gathering is more wine & cheese, and less beer & burgers, I don’t think you’ll notice the Roam’s extra detail over the sound of your guests enjoying themselves.

    You can tweak the Roam 2’s bass and treble to your liking via the Sonos app, but there’s a catch: it only works over a Wi-Fi connection. The Flip 7, on the other hand, has an app with both preset and manual EQ adjustments that can be controlled at any time using the speaker’s Bluetooth connection.

    Listening to lossless audio on these speakers provides the expected improvements in detail and nuance (though it doesn’t change their fundamental sound signatures). However, once again, the Roam 2 is limited by its reliance on Wi-Fi. With the Flip 7, you can get lossless audio from any device that has a USB-C audio output (laptops, phones, and tablets) as long as these devices have lossless content stored on them or they can stream it. The Roam 2 needs a home wireless network.

    With its much more powerful system, easy lossless connection, and EQ settings that can be managed no matter where you are, the Flip 7 simply brings more to the table, whether that table is on your deck, or in the middle of the countryside.q

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Sonos Roam 2: The verdict

    JBL Flip 7 (side view).
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Buy at Amazon

    With wins in every category, the JBL Flip 7 takes this contest in a landslide. It’s got almost everything you could ask for in a portable Bluetooth speaker.

    It lacks the Roam 2’s ability to integrate into a Wi-Fi based Sonos whole-home wireless sound system, and it can be a bit rough around the edges both in looks and sound quality, but it’s the better choice overall for most people.

    Does that mean you should ignore the Roam 2? Nope, it’s a great little speaker. It’s perfect for folks who want a sleek, smart addition to their Sonos home system that can also move out to the patio, survive the elements, and travel with you on your next trip.

    But the Roam 2’s strength is being able to play both roles, while the Flip 7 is laser focused on a singular mission: to be the best go-anywhere, survive anything, party machine and at that it succeeds better than almost any other speaker.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

  • JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: Which portable speaker is right for you?

    For years, JBL dominated our list of the best Bluetooth speakers, especially in the sub-$200 category where the company’s line of Flip speakers have proven so popular. That popularity continues with the Flip 7, the best version of the cylindrical powerhouse so far. But JBL is no longer alone. When Beats revived its fan-favorite Pill speaker in 2024, it did so at a more accesible price and added some great new features.

    The similarites between these Bluetooth speakers are obvious, and yet, a deeper look reveals where each has its strengths. The question is, which one is a better match for your lifestyle?

    We put them side by side to see which one makes the most sense for you.

    JBL Flip 7

    Buy at Amazon

    Beats Pill (2024)

    Buy at Amazon

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: Price

    JBL Flip 7 and Beats Pill.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    As a newly released product, the Flip 7 has yet to see any discounts on its $150 regular price. This may well prove to be the case into the summer months as JBL focuses on getting rid of its remaining Flip 6 inventory.

    The Beats Pill has the same $150 regular price, but since it debuted in July 2024, we’ve seen it dip down to as low as $100 on several occasions. That’s a massive discount if you can get it. If recent history is any indication, your next opportunity may not be far away.

    There are no guarantees, of course, but we’re going to give this one to the Pill purely based on its price history.

    Winner: Beats Pill

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: Specs comparison

    JBL Flip 7 Beats Pill (2024)
    Colors Black, Blue, Squad, White, Red Matte Black, Champagne Gold, Dark Grey, Light Grey, Statement Red
    Weight 1.23 pounds 1.5 pounds
    Dimensions 2.8 x 7.19 x 2.7 inches 2.8 x 8.6 x 2.8 inches
    Charging cable included No Yes
    Battery Life Up to 16 hours Up to 24 hours
    Charging input USB-C USB-C
    Charging output None USB-C
    Drop-proof Tested 1 meter onto concrete No
    Water/dust resistance IP68 IP67
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
    Additional features Auracast:

    • Stereo pairing
    • Multispeaker sharing

    USB Audio
    Swappable attachments

    • Stereo mode: Join two Pill speakers in a left/right configuration
    • Amplify mode: Play the same audio on two Pill speakers

    Speakerphone
    USB Audio
    Lanyard included

    On specs alone, the Beats Pill appears to outshine the JBL Flip 7 on almost everything except ruggedness and portability. But since we’re talking about speakers that people will want to take absolutely everywhere, these are important factors.

    The Flip 7 is a little more waterproof than the Pill at IP68 versus IP67, but given that neither speaker floats especially well, this likely won’t make a big difference in your life. Keep them both poolside, knowing they’ll survive an accidental immersion.

    JBL’s drop-proofing and rugged woven fibre exterior (with rubber endcaps) makes the Flip 7 far better suited to go-anywhere adventuring. Not that I recommend banging either speaker into other objects or dropping them, but I have no doubt that if these things were to happen, the Flip 7 would survive better than the Pill. It’s the Pill’s metal grille that worries me most. It looks great, but it will dent and scratch like the hood of a car if you hit it hard enough.

    JBL Flip 7 and Beats Pill.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The Flip 7 is also a little lighter and fractionally smaller. The difference isn’t massive, but again, if portability is key, it’s another point in JBL’s favor.

    Since portable speakers are often used far from power sources, battery life is arguably one of the most important specs, and it’s no contest. With up to 24 hours of playtime, the Beats Pill far outlasts the Flip 7 even when that speaker is set to Playtime Boost mode, which extends its normal 14-hour endurance to 16 hours.

    Moreover, the Pill packs so much energy, Beats lets you use it to charge your phone via USB-C. You’ll have to move up to the Flip 7’s larger sibling, the Charge 6, to get that feature in the JBL world.

    Both speakers let you play lossless audio via their USB-C ports, however, the Pill also functions as a speakerphone, a handy extra feature that the Flip 7 lacks.

    Finally, both speakers let you create a stereo pair when you have two of the same models on hand. You can also extend their audio to other speakers, but this is where the Flip 7 enjoys a big advantage.

    You can only extend the Pill’s audio to one other Pill. The Flip 7 can extend its audio to an unlimited number of other Auracast-enabled JBL speakers, which includes the Flip 7, Charge 6, Xtreme 4, and several of its newer Party Box models. For party-powering expansion, that’s an unbeatable system.

    This creates a conundrum. A bigger battery (and the ability to charge other devices) makes the Pill a better choice for those who want to wander where there’s no power sources. On the other hand, those are exactly the sorts of places where the Flip 7’s ruggedized body will prove most beneficial. This one comes down to how (and where) you want to use your speaker, but for us, it’s a tie.

    Winner: Tie

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: Design

    JBL Flip 7, close-up.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Though they’re both carved from the same basic geometric shape, in the looks department, these speakers come from opposite sides of tracks. It’s like comparing a Jeep to a Corvette. The Beats Pill is sleek, smooth, and curvy, with a sophisticated metal grille and controls that are so understated, they’re practically hidden. The JBL Flip 7, by contrast, is rugged and a little rough — the kind of Bluetooth speaker Batman might hang from his utility belt.

    That even translates to the included attachments. The Pill comes with an elegant, fabric wrist lanyard, while the Flip 7 has a carry loop and a carabiner that can be swapped in seconds thanks to its clever Pushlock system.

    Beats Pill (2024) in Champagne/Gold
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The Flip 7 earns a few extra points for usability. It can stand vertically — something I don’t recommend trying with the Pill — and its controls are oversized and easy to find, even if the day’s activities have left you with diminished hand-eye coordination.

    Since design is more than just visual appeal, we’re giving this one to the Flip 7 for its all-terrain capability.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: Sound quality

    JBL Flip 7 (side view).
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    This is another tricky one. For products like headphones and hi-fi speakers, sound quality is usually about rendering source material with accuracy, tonal balance, and the mitigation of distortion.

    If you apply those same criteria to the Beats Pill and the JBL Flip 7, the Pill comes out on top. It has a cleaner, better balanced sound signature, and it will happily ride all the way to its maximum loudness level without any noticeable distortion.

    But when it comes to Bluetooth portables, it’s arguable that we might want less panache and more power — especially when outdoors. This is where the Flip 7 excels. It gets much louder than the Pill, and it pumps out more bass. The JBL Portables app also gives you a variety of EQ settings (both presets and a custom equalizer), whereas the Pill is a take-it-or-leave-it speaker in terms of tuning.

    The Flip 7’s power, while better controlled than previous generations, can get a little harsh as you increase volume. Despite the introduction of a new AI Sound algorithm intended to fight distortion, it nonetheless creeps in at the highest levels.

    USB lossless audio on both speakers has the same effect — it lets you maximize their potential when conditions are quiet enough to hear the difference. But it doesn’t change that sound quality balance. The Pill is better for critical listening while the Flip 7 is a true party machine.

    Again, if this were a comparison of indoor, wireless speakers, the Pill would win. However, one of the primary missions of any Bluetooth portable is to bring the tunes to all kinds of locations, in all kinds of conditions. With its more powerful system, the Flip 7 is the better choice.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    JBL Flip 7 vs. Beats Pill: The verdict

    JBL Flip 7 hand-held near a pool.
    Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Buy at Amazon

    With two wins, the JBL Flip 7 — on paper at least — is our winner. It’s a very capable portable speaker that’s built to endure rough handling and other potential mishaps, while providing surprisingly powerful audio for its size. And let’s not forget its expandability via JBL’s lineup of Aurcast speakers.

    It lacks the Beats Pill’s speakerphone function, which is undeniably handy, but which I also suspect is low on most people’s wish lists for Bluetooth speakers.

    The only difference that gives me pause its the Pill’s extraordinary battery life and external device charging. Do you need up to 24 hours of playtime on a speaker? No, but it sure is helpful for when you forget to charge it, or if you’re planning an extended time away from an available power supply.

    If battery life and better overall sound quality are key to your decision, you can safely ignore the outcome of this contest — the Beats Pill is the better choice for your needs.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

  • JBL Charge 6 review: Why a simple strap makes it the perfect portable speaker

    JBL Charge 6

    MSRP $200.00

    3.5/5

    ★★★☆☆

    Score Details

    “More powerful and portable than ever, the Charge 6 makes a great music companion.”

    ✅ Pros

    • Rugged and waterproof
    • Powerful for its size
    • Convenient multipurpose strap
    • Excellent battery life
    • USB Audio

    ❌ Cons

    • No speakerphone function
    • No aux input
    • Over-emphasized highs

    Buy at Amazon JBL’s Charge series of portable Bluetooth speakers has been a perennial favorite for those who want powerful tunes to go. It’s easy to see why. With a rugged build, a big battery that can also be used to charge your other devices, and enough volume to power a mid-size pool party, the Charge is hard to beat. Now that JBL has rolled out the Charge 6, it’s an even more compelling product, but maybe not for the reasons you’re thinking.

    Getting a handle on the situation

    JBL Charge 6 and Charge 5 Wi-Fi.
    JBL Charge 6 (front) and Charge 5 Wi-Fi. Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Out of the box, the Charge 6 looks unchanged from its predecessor, the JBL Charge 5. It’s the same cylindrical shape with the same rugged woven fabric wrap, bearing the same oversized JBL logo. Even the weight, at 2.1 pounds, is the same.

    But it’s the little differences that count. The Charge 6 can float and is now more waterproof than before (IP68 versus IP67), and JBL has added drop-proofing too. The base has been reshaped to give it a more solid stance on flat surfaces — the Charge 5 was easy to roll backward or forward — and the rubberized ends that protect the two passive radiators now have four “legs” instead of three. JBL has also separated the controls for power, Bluetooth, and Auracast from those that manage play/pause and volume up/down, making it easier to access the most frequently used buttons.

    JBL Charge 6, strap close-up.

    Still, the biggest and best change has to be the included strap. It can do double-duty as a wrist strap or a carry handle, and it fundamentally changes the experience of toting the speaker around. You can get away without a handle on a smaller speaker like the JBL Flip 7 or the Beats Pill, but at just over two pounds, a bigger speaker like the Charge 6 can be a handful.

    By comparison, most similarly sized speakers often lack any kind of carrying assistance. The older Charge 5 doesn’t come with any carrying accessories, and the speaker doesn’t have a built-in spot to attach one if you bought your own. The UE Everboom has a small accessory loop on the back, but it’s only designed for a carabiner. The Monster DNA Max has a wrist strap, but it’s not as comfortable to use as the Charge 6’s strap.

    I know, it seems like a small thing. However, I now happily carry the Charge 6 from room to room during the day, whereas the Charge 5 tended to stay put.

    Sadly, JBL hasn’t equipped the Charge 6 with a mic for speakerphone capability. And while it can connect to external digital sources via its USB-C port, there’s no aux input for analog sources.

    JBL Charge 6 specs

    Price $200
    Size 9 x 3.9 x 3.7 inches
    Weight 2.11 pounds
    Power 45 watts (peak)
    Battery life Up to 28 hours
    Water/dust resistance IP68
    Charging USB-C
    Inputs USB-C for lossless, digital audio
    Connectivity Bluetooth 5.4 (SBC/AAC)
    Stereo/mono Mono
    Stereo pairing/audio sharing Yes/yes

    Bigger (and sometimes better) sound

    JBL Charge 6, strap close-up.

    As I said in the intro, Charge speakers have long been a great choice for get-togethers, especially outdoors, thanks to their impressive power (considering their size). On this front, the Charge 6 doesn’t disappoint.

    JBL says the Charge 6 has a slightly higher maximum wattage than the Charge 5 (45 versus 40 watts), but the most noticeable difference is the inclusion of EQ presets and a more comprehensive equalizer in the JBL Portables app. These settings, combined with a new AI Sound algorithm, let the Charge 6 pump out stronger bass and clearer highs, with less distortion than its predecessor.

    There is, however, something about the new tuning that tends to over-emphasize the highest frequencies. It’s most noticeable when using the Energetic preset. I’m especially sensitive to this kind of thing, but if it bugs you too, the easy answer is to use the custom EQ option in the app and reduce the level of the highs.

    With USB Audio too

    JBL Charge 6.

    I’m still not entirely sure how valuable USB Audio is on a portable speaker like the Charge 6, but I’m glad to have the option. When plugged into a compatible USB-C port on a computer or smartphone (you’ll need to press and hold the play button as you plug it in), the Charge 6 can process lossless digital audio, for a smoother overall sound than you get with Bluetooth.

    The improvement won’t be night and day for most folks, and if you don’t have a lossless source of music like Apple Music or Qobuz, you won’t get any benefit at all. Still, that over-emphasis on high frequencies I noticed via Bluetooth is substantially reduced when playing via USB Audio.

    If you’re listening critically, you may notice greater detail, particularly through the mids.

    Expanded audio sharing

    The Charge 6, like almost all of JBL’s portables and party speakers announced since 2024, uses Auracast for audio sharing. Like the now-discontinued Party Boost feature, it’s easy to create stereo pairs or multi-speaker groups using Auracast, but now you’ve got more choice. The Charge 6 can share with any other JBL Auracast speaker with no limit on the number. If the speaker is in Bluetooth range, it can be added to the group.

    I tried it with a Flip 7 and it worked like a charm, quickly grabbing the Flip’s audio and playing it back in perfect sync.

    Charging, simplified

    JBL Charge 6.

    Previous Charge models used one port for charging the speaker and a second port for charging external devices. The Charge 6 simplifies this with a single USB-C port for both activities. That’s one less cable to bring with you (as long as all of your devices are USB-C compatible).

    Speaking of cables, you’ll need to use your own or buy one: the Charge 6 doesn’t come with its own in the box.

    More power

    JBL Charge 6.

    Speaking of charging, you’ll have a bit more battery capacity to play with when juicing up your other devices. The Charge 6 has a 34-watt-hour battery versus the Charge 5’s 27-watt-hour cell. This also translates into longer play time on the speaker. JBL claims you can get 24 hours of regular playback, plus an additional 4 hours if you switch to Playtime Boost mode (which disables the EQ function). The Charge 5, for its part, maxes out at 20 hours.

    Conclusion

    Buy at Amazon

    New Bluetooth speakers are constantly appearing. I haven’t, for instance, tried Sony’s new $200 Ult Field 3, or LG’s new $200 XBoom Bounce. They may perform better than the Charge 6 in some areas, such as battery life or sound quality, but neither has USB Audio, Auracast sharing, or that awesome convertible strap.

    In fact, the Charge 6’s top competition might come from the Charge 5, which you’ll now see regularly discounted until JBL runs out of stock. If you can grab it for $150 or less, I think you should. The Charge 6 is better, no question, but for most folks, the fifth-gen speaker is still just fine.

  • JBL Flip 6 vs. Flip 7: discounts determine this fight

    Portable Bluetooth speakers are so handy that everyone who likes to listen to music should own one. For years, JBL’s Flip line of speakers has been topping recommendation lists across the internet and for good reason: they’re the perfect blend of portability, ruggedness, and sound quality.

    The question is, now that the Flip is in its seventh generation, should you buy JBL’s latest and greatest portable, or stick with the Flip 6 even though it’s now a few years old?

    Let’s put ‘em both side by side and see which one makes the most sense for you.

    JBL Flip 6

    Buy at Dell

    JBL Flip 7

    Buy at Amazon

    Flip 7 vs. Flip 6: Price

    JBL Flip 7 and Flip 6.
    JBL Flip 7 (left) and Flip 6. Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    Not only is the Flip 7 brand new and therefore unlikely to see significant discounts until the holiday season, but it also starts out $20 more expensive than the Flip 6 did when it was released: $150 versus $130.

    On the flip side, the Flip 6 is already selling for way less than its original price — in some cases for as low as $80.

    At $20 price may not be massive, but $70 is a big savings. A 46% savings, to be precise.

    On price alone, this one’s as easy as it gets.

    Winner: JBL Flip 6

    Flip 7 vs. Flip 6: Specs comparison

    JBL Flip 6 JBL Flip 7
    Colors Teal, Grey, Pink, Red, Black, Blue, Squad, White, Green Black, Blue, Squad, White, Red
    Weight 1.21 pounds 1.23 pounds
    Charging cable included Yes No
    Battery Life Up to 12 hours Up to 16 hours
    Power (watts) 30 watts 35 watts
    Charging USB-C USB-C
    Drop-proof No Tested 1 meter onto concrete
    Water/dust resistance IP67 IP68
    Bluetooth version 5.1 5.4
    Additional features PartyBoost:

    • Stereo pairing
    • Multispeaker sharing
    Auracast:

    • Stereo pairing
    • Multispeaker sharing

    USB Audio
    Swappable attachments

    If size, shape, and weight are the specs that govern how portable a speaker is, there’s no difference between the Flip 7 and Flip 6.

    The Flip 7 does enjoy higher ratings for ruggedness. The Flip 6 is IP67, making it effectively water and dust-proof.  The Flip 7 is IP68-rated. That single-digit difference means that the Flip 7 can withstand 30 minutes of full immersion at a depth of 1.5 meters, whereas the Flip 6 can only handle 1 meter. But since neither speaker floats, you probably shouldn’t take either one in the pool.

    The Flip 7 has also been drop-tested to a height of 1 meter onto concrete. I suspect the Flip 6 could handle a similar drop, but officially speaking, it hasn’t proven it can do so.

    Since portable speakers are often used far from power sources, battery life is arguably the most important spec. While 14 hours versus 12 hours might not seem like a huge bump, with the Flip 7’s Playtime Boost mode, you can increase its endurance to 16 hours, which is a very welcome improvement.

    The Flip 7 can get louder. Not massively so, but when you want to power a party, every bit helps.

    The only other major difference is the Flip 7’s USB audio capability. We’ll cover this under sound quality, because that’s the only benefit.

    Lastly, there’s the Flip 7’s use of Aurcast instead of the Flip 6’s PartyBoost tech. Both let these speakers be used as stereo pairs or as part of a larger collection of simultaneously playing speakers. However, PartyBoost is only compatible with a small number of other JBL PartyBoost speakers, whereas Auracast is supported on virtually all of JBL’s new line of portable speakers, including its PartyBox lineup.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    Flip 7 vs. Flip 6: Design

    JBL Flip 7 and Flip 6.
    JBL Flip 7 (left) and Flip 6. Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The Flip 6 and 7 look so alike, it’s nearly impossible to tell them apart. Still, JBL has made some thoughtful changes to the Flip 7 that you may find desirable.

    Instead of a single looped wrist lanyard, JBL includes a carry loop and a carabiner attachment and these can be swapped in seconds thanks to the Flip 7’s clever Pushlock system.

    JBL Flip 6 and Flip 7 side-by-side.
    JBL Flip 7 (bottom) and Flip 6. Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    The control buttons have simplified. Instead of placing the Party Boost button next to the volume-down button, where you might press it by accident, the Aurcast button is now located next to the power and Bluetooth buttons on the back of the speaker.

    Highly observant folks will note that the endcaps on the Flip 7 are now configured with four raised rubber “feet” instead of the tripod design on the Flip 6, but this doesn’t affect performance or functionality.

    These changes are all minor, but they’re changes for the better, so the Flip 7 wins this one by a hair.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    Flip 7 vs. Flip 6: Sound quality

    JBL Flip 7 and Flip 6.
    JBL Flip 7 (left) and Flip 6. Simon Cohen / Digital Trends

    JBL made quite a few tweaks to the Flip 7’s audio characteristics. The drivers are the same size, but now the woofer gets five more watts of power for a total of 35 watts versus 30 watts on the Flip 6.

    There’s a new AI Sound Boost algorithm that’s designed to keep distortion in check even as you take advantage of that greater volume.

    And within the JBL Portables app, the Flip 7 has access to a much wider range of EQ adjustments including presets and a custom equalizer.

    The result (especially when you engage the Energetic preset) is a significantly punchier, more powerful bass response. When combined with the Flip 7’s greater power, it really is a more satisfying listening experience regardless of genre.

    USB audio lets you take advantage of lossless audio. Honestly, you won’t notice the improvement if you’re outside, especially if you’re having a party. But for indoor listening, when you can really pay attention, there are subtle improvements to be heard.

    It’s worth noting that all of the Flip 7’s sonic advantages can only be appreciated above a volume level greater than 50%. Nonetheless, the newer model kicks out fuller, more powerful sound, so this one goes to the Flip 7 too.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7

    Flip 7 vs. Flip 6: The verdict

    JBL Flip 7 hand-held near a pool.

    Buy at Amazon

    On paper and in real life, the Flip 7’s improvements make for an undeniably better portable speaker.

    And if, based on their regular prices, you only had to pay $20 more for the Flip 7 over the Flip 6, I’d say this is a slam-dunk for the Flip 7.

    But the reality is, the Flip 6 has almost spent more time at $100 over the last two years, and now that the Flip 7 is here to give it competition, I expect we’ll see the Flip 6 at that price or lower from now until the end of 2025.

    Better is better, so we’re going to call the Flip 7 our overall winner. But even with the Flip 7’s welcome improvements, if you can grab a Flip 6 for $80-$100, I think you should do so.

    Winner: JBL Flip 7